This federal civil case has been brought by two unnamed Richmond, Virginia residents who are suing Patriot Front - the entire organization - for harm caused by the Patriot Front targetting their predonominantly black neighborhood with hate speech and vandalism.
| Number | Date Filed | Document | Filed By | Pages | Type | Cost to Retrieve | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022/10/18 | This is the original complaint filed by the plaintiffs. It's 36 pages of legal argument and photos showing members of the Patriot Front destroying the Arthur Ashe mural in Richmand, Virginia. The Patriot Front regularly documents their acts of vandalism and publishes photos of their crimes online. | 2022/10/18 | 36 | 3.6 | View | |
| 1-1 | 2022/10/18 | Civil Cover Sheet | 2022/10/18 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 7 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 9 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 11 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 12 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 13 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 14 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 15 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 16 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 17 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 18 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 19 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 20 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 21 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 22 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 23 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 24 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 25 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 26 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 27 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 28 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 29 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 30 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 31 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 32 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 33 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 34 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 35 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 36 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 37 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 38 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 39 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 40 | 12/15/2022 | Summons of Patriot Front leader Thomas Rousseau. | 12/15/2022 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 41 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 42 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 43 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 44 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 45 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 46 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 47 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 48 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 49 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 50 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 51 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 52 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 53 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 54 | 01/12/2023 | Summons of Patriot Front member William Ring. | 01/12/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 55 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 56 | 02/02/2023 | Document created by Patriot Front defendant Nathon Noyce. Noyce is attempting to file a time extension for Noyce and another Patriot Front defendant Thomas Dail. | 02/02/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 56-1 | 02/02/2023 | 02/02/2023 | 1 | 0.1 | View | ||
| 57 | 02/07/2023 | Response from plaintiff regarding document 56 and 56-1. | 02/07/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 58 | 02/07/2023 | This matter comes to this Court sua sponte. | 02/07/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 59 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 60 | 02/13/2023 | Notice that Patriot Front member Daniel Turetchi was served at 231 Bray Drive, Bunker Hill, West Virginia. | 02/13/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 61 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 62 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 63 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 64 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 65 | 03/01/2023 | Maryland lawyer Glen K. Allen - known to represent white nationalists and espouses white nationalist ideology - agrees to represent Patriot Front defendants. Virginia lawyer Bradley P. Marrs vouched for Allen in this document. | 03/01/2023 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 66 | 03/01/2023 | Patriot Front defendants Nathaniel Noyce and Thomas Dail filed a motion to dismiss. | 03/01/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 67 | 03/01/2023 | This is the first filing by Patriot Front since two of the members found lawyers Glen K. Allen, of Maryland, and Bradley P. Marrs, of Virginia to represent Noyce and Dail. This is defendant's legal argument to the court to dismiss this case. | 03/01/2023 | 23 | 2.3 | View | |
| 68 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 70 | 03/02/2023 | Patriot Front member Dan Turetchi requests from the court more time to find a lawyer. | 03/02/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 71 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 72 | 03/07/2023 | Summons in a Civil Action served on Patriot Front member Aedan C. Tredinnick of Norfolk, Virginia. | 03/07/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 73 | 03/08/2023 | The Plaintiffs request from the court more time to respond to the Patriot Front motion to dismiss this case. | 03/08/2023 | 6 | 0.6 | View | |
| 74 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 75 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 76 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 77 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 78 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 79 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 80 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 81 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 82 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 83 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 83-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 84 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 85 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 86-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 87 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 87-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 88 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 89 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 90 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 91 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 92 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 93 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | View |
| 94 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 95 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 96 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 97 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 98 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 99 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 100 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 100-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 101 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 101-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 102 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 103 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 104 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 105 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 106 | 08/07/2023 | Plaintiffs' response to the Defendant's last amended motion to dismiss. This is a lengthy, well-cited legal document. | 08/07/2023 | 41 | 4.1 | View | |
| 107 | 8/14/2023 | Patriot Front defendants Noyce, Dail, Turetchi, Tredinnick and Gancarz request that the plaintiff's amended complaint be dismissed in its entirety. Defendants also request oral arguments on the motion. | 8/14/2023 | 21 | 2.1 | View | |
| 109 | 9/11/2023 | After many months, plaintiffs served defendant Jacob Brown in this case. Brown was served in Sepetember 2023 in Ridge, New York. | 9/11/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 110 | 9/19/2023 | Withdrawal of Motion by All Plaintiffs re 92 MOTION for Extension, 91 Notice of Abatement,, Notice of Withdrawal of Motion and Suggestion of Mootness (Shebelskie, Michael) (Entered: 09/14/2023) | 9/19/2023 | 0 | - | 0 | View |
| 111 | 09/19/2023 | Judge's order that the service for defendant Jacob Brown was timely. | 09/19/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 113 | 09/27/2023 | ORDER that this matter comes before the Court on Arusha Gordons Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel (the Motion) 112 . Upon due consideration, for good cause shown, and because Edward Caspar and Arthur Ago of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, and counsel from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison LLP and Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP will continue to represent Plaintiffs, the Court GRANTS the Motion 112 . The Court WITHDRAWS Arusha Gordon as counsel of record. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 9/27/2023 | 09/27/2023 | 0 | - | 0 | View |
| 114 | 10/12/2023 | Request for clerk's entry of default against Jack Brown | 10/12/2023 | 4 | 0.4 | View | |
| 114-1 | 10/12/2023 | Declaration by plaintiffs' attorney as to the facts around the request for default judgement against Jacob Brown (114) | 10/12/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 115 | 10/19/2023 | Judge orders plaintiffs' attorneys explain the address discrepancy in when serving Patriot Front member Jacob Brown before ruling on the request for default judgement against Brown. | 10/19/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 116 | 10/24/2023 | Plaintiff attorneys responding to the judge's request to explain address discrepancy when serving Patriot Front member Jacob Brown before ruling on motion for a default judgement against Brown. | 10/24/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 116-1 | 10/24/2023 | Declaration by plaintiffs' attorney as to the facts around the order from the judgement involving address discrepancy when serving Patriot Front member Jacob Brown (115) | 10/24/2023 | 4 | 0.4 | View | |
| 117 | 10/26/2023 | Judge orders default judgement against Patriot Front member Jacob Brown. | 10/26/2023 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 118 | 10/26/2023 | Clerk files a default judgement against Patriot Front member Jacob Brown per the judge's order (117) | 10/26/2023 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 119 | 12/05/2023 | Judge orders that law clerk does not need to recuse from this case based on prior work in this legal space. | 12/05/2023 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 120 | 01/22/2024 | Judge orders that Local Civil Rules for the US District Court for the Eastern District Rule 7(E) shall not apply to this case. Rule 7(E) is the Return Date rule. Except as otherwise provided by an order of the Court or by these Local Rules, all motions shall be made returnable to the time obtained from and scheduled by the Court for a hearing thereon. The moving party shall be responsible to set the motion for hearing or to arrange with opposing counsel for submission of the motion without oral argument. Unless otherwise ordered, a motion shall be deemed withdrawn if the movant does not set it for hearing (or arrange to submit it without a hearing) within thirty (30) days after the date on which the motion is filed. The non-moving party also may arrange for a hearing. Before endeavoring to secure an appointment for a hearing on any motion, it shall be incumbent upon the counsel desiring such hearing to meet and confer in person or by telephone with his or her opposing counsel in a good-faith effort to narrow the area of disagreement. In the absence of any agreement, such conference shall be held in the office of the attorney nearest the Court in the division in which the action is pending. In any division that has a regularly scheduled motions day, the motion should be noticed for the first permissible motions day. The hearing date of motions for summary judgment is also governed by Local Civil Rule 56. | 01/22/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 121 | 01/31/2024 | Defendants Nathan Noyce, Thomas Dail, Paul Gancarz, Daniel Turetchi, and Aedan Tredinnick have requested, based on the court's previous ruling, a hearing with oral arguments to debate defendant's motion to dismiss this case. | 01/31/2024 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 122 | 03/04/2024 | The judge has granted the Patriot Front request there be oral arguments to debate the Patriot Front's motion to dismiss the case. | 03/04/2024 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 123 | 03/19/2024 | Application to qualify as a foreign attorney under local civil rule 83.1(E) and local criminal rule 57.4(E) | 03/19/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 124 | 03/20/2024 | Judge Signed Application to qualify as a foreign attorney under local civil rule 83.1(E) and local criminal rule 57.4(E) | 03/20/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 125 | - | - | - | 0 | - | View | |
| 126 | 04/27/2024 | Oral argument minute sheet. Set to start a 2PM Began: 2:04 PM ENDED: 3:30 PM TIME IN COURT: 1 HOUR, 26 MINUTES | 04/27/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 127 | 03/31/2024 | Judge denies defendant's motion to dismiss this case before going to trial. | 03/31/2024 | 71 | 0 | View | |
| 128 | 03/31/2024 | Court order rejecting the motion to dismiss this case. | 03/31/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 129 | 04/11/2024 | Defendants' request for 10 days to respond to the plaintiff's original complaint. | 04/11/2024 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 129-1 | 04/11/2024 | Defendant order granting defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to file answers | 04/11/2024 | 1 | 0.1 | View | |
| 130 | 04/12/2024 | Judge grant defendants' request for time extension. | 04/12/2024 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 131 | 04/25/2024 | Patriot Front Thomas Dail responds to plaintiff's complaint, denying that Patriot Front is a racist hate group. | 04/25/2024 | 17 | 1.7 | View | |
| 132 | 04/25/2024 | Patriot Front Paul Gancarz responds to plaintiff's complaint, denying that Patriot Front is a racist hate group. | 04/25/2024 | 19 | 1.9 | View | |
| 133 | 04/25/2024 | Patriot Front Nathan Noyce responds to plaintiff's complaint, denying that Patriot Front is a racist hate group. | 04/25/2024 | 17 | 1.7 | View | |
| 134 | 04/25/2024 | Patriot Front Aedan Tredinnick responds to plaintiff's complaint, denying that Patriot Front is a racist hate group. | 04/25/2024 | 15 | 1.5 | View | |
| 135 | 04/25/2024 | Patriot Front Daniel Turetchi responds to plaintiff's complaint, denying that Patriot Front is a racist hate group. | 04/25/2024 | 17 | 1.7 | View | |
| 136 | - | - | - | 0 | - | 0 | View |
| 137 | 04/29/2024 | Defendants' motion for certification of the court's March 31, 2024 Order for Interlocutory Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. 1292(B) | 04/29/2024 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 138 | 04/29/2024 | Defendants' memorandum in support of their motion for certification for an interlocutary appeal. | 04/29/2024 | 14 | 1.4 | View | |
| 139 | 05/02/2024 | Plaintiff attorney Arthur Ngo is no longer employed by Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. | 05/02/2024 | 3 | 0.3 | View | |
| 140 | 05/06/2024 | Judge grant defendants' request for Attorney Arthur Ngo to withdraw from this case. | 05/06/2024 | 2 | 0.2 | View | |
| 141 | 05/13/2024 | Plaintiffs' motion opposing defendant's request for an interlocutory appeal. | 05/13/2024 | 19 | 1.9 | View |